HB 1279-6_ Filed 02/20/2006, 10:52 Hershman
Adopted 2/20/2006

SENATE MOTION


MADAM PRESIDENT:

    I move
that Engrossed House Bill 1279 be amended to read as follows:

SOURCE: Page 66, line 36; (06)MO127930.66. -->     Page 66, between lines 36 and 37, begin a new paragraph and insert:
    " Sec. 9. (a) Except as provided in subsection (b), the owner, operator, or developer of multitenant real estate located in a service area in which one (1) or more communications service providers are authorized to provide communications service may not do any of the following:
        (1) Prevent a communications service provider from installing on the premises communications service equipment that an occupant requests.
        (2) Interfere with a communications service provider's installation on the premises of communications service equipment that an occupant requests.
        (3) Discriminate against a communications service provider or impose unduly burdensome conditions on the terms, conditions, and compensation for a communications service provider's installation of communications service equipment on the premises.
        (4) Demand or accept an unreasonable payment from:
            (A) an occupant; or
            (B) a communications service provider;
        in exchange for allowing the communications service provider access to the premises.
        (5) Discriminate against or in favor of an occupant in any manner, including charging higher or lower rental charges to the occupant, because of the communications service provider from which the occupant receives communications service.
    (b) This section does not prohibit the owner, operator, or developer of multitenant real estate from doing any of the following:
        (1) Imposing a condition on a communications service

provider that is reasonably necessary to protect:
            (A) the safety, security, appearance, or condition of the property; or
            (B) the safety and convenience of other persons.
        (2) Imposing a reasonable limitation on the hours during which a communications service provider may have access to the premises to install communications service equipment.
        (3) Imposing a reasonable limitation on the number of communications service providers that have access to the premises, if the owner, operator, or developer can demonstrate a space constraint that requires the limitation.
        (4) Requiring a communications service provider to agree to indemnify the owner, operator, or developer for damage caused by installing, operating, or removing communications service equipment on or from the premises.
        (5) Requiring an occupant or a communications service provider to bear the entire cost of installing, operating, or removing communications service equipment.
        (6) Requiring a communications service provider to pay compensation for access to or use of the premises, as long as the compensation is:
            (A) reasonable; and
            (B) nondiscriminatory;
        among communications service providers.
    (c) For purposes of this subsection, an "affected person" includes the following:
        (1) An occupant that is a current or potential subscriber of communications service on the premises of multitenant real estate.
        (2) A unit in which multitenant real estate is located, acting on behalf of:
            (A) a person described in subdivision (1); or
            (B) other similarly situated persons.
        (3) A communications service provider.
An affected person that alleges a violation of this section by the owner, operator, or developer of multitenant real estate may seek equitable or compensatory relief in a court having jurisdiction. The


party prevailing in any action filed under this section is entitled to recover the costs of the action, including reasonable attorney's fees as determined by the court.

     Sec. 10. The commission may adopt rules under IC 4-22-2 to implement this chapter.".
    (Reference is to EHB 1279 as printed February 17, 2006.)

________________________________________

Senator HERSHMAN


MO127930/DI 92
2006