MADAM PRESIDENT:
I move
that Engrossed House Bill 1279 be amended to read as follows:
provider that is reasonably necessary to protect:
(A) the safety, security, appearance, or condition of the
property; or
(B) the safety and convenience of other persons.
(2) Imposing a reasonable limitation on the hours during
which a communications service provider may have access to
the premises to install communications service equipment.
(3) Imposing a reasonable limitation on the number of
communications service providers that have access to the
premises, if the owner, operator, or developer can
demonstrate a space constraint that requires the limitation.
(4) Requiring a communications service provider to agree to
indemnify the owner, operator, or developer for damage
caused by installing, operating, or removing communications
service equipment on or from the premises.
(5) Requiring an occupant or a communications service
provider to bear the entire cost of installing, operating, or
removing communications service equipment.
(6) Requiring a communications service provider to pay
compensation for access to or use of the premises, as long as
the compensation is:
(A) reasonable; and
(B) nondiscriminatory;
among communications service providers.
(c) For purposes of this subsection, an "affected person"
includes the following:
(1) An occupant that is a current or potential subscriber of
communications service on the premises of multitenant real
estate.
(2) A unit in which multitenant real estate is located, acting on
behalf of:
(A) a person described in subdivision (1); or
(B) other similarly situated persons.
(3) A communications service provider.
An affected person that alleges a violation of this section by the
owner, operator, or developer of multitenant real estate may seek
equitable or compensatory relief in a court having jurisdiction. The