MADAM PRESIDENT:
The Senate Committee on Tax and Fiscal Policy, to which was referred House Bill No. 1767,
has had the same under consideration and begs leave to report the same back to the Senate
with the recommendation that said bill be AMENDED as follows:
increase is reasonably necessary due to increased costs of the civil
taxing unit resulting from annexation, consolidation, or other
extensions of governmental services by the civil taxing unit to
additional geographic areas or persons.
(2) Permission to the civil taxing unit to increase its levy in excess
of the limitations established under section 3 of this chapter, if the
local government tax control board finds that the civil taxing unit
needs the increase to meet the civil taxing unit's share of the costs
of operating a court established by statute enacted after December
31, 1973. Before recommending such an increase, the local
government tax control board shall consider all other revenues
available to the civil taxing unit that could be applied for that
purpose. The maximum aggregate levy increases that the local
government tax control board may recommend for a particular
court equals the civil taxing unit's estimate of the unit's share of
the costs of operating a court for the first full calendar year in
which it is in existence. For purposes of this subdivision, costs of
operating a court include:
(A) the cost of personal services (including fringe benefits);
(B) the cost of supplies; and
(C) any other cost directly related to the operation of the court.
(3) Permission to the civil taxing unit to increase its levy in excess
of the limitations established under section 3 of this chapter, if the
local government tax control board finds that the quotient
determined under STEP SIX of the following formula is equal to
or greater than one and two-hundredths (1.02):
STEP ONE: Determine the three (3) calendar years that most
immediately precede the ensuing calendar year and in which
a statewide general reassessment of real property or the initial
annual adjustment of the assessed value of real property
under IC 6-1.1-4-4.5 does not first become effective.
STEP TWO: Compute separately, for each of the calendar
years determined in STEP ONE, the quotient (rounded to the
nearest ten-thousandth (0.0001)) of the sum of the civil taxing
unit's total assessed value of all taxable property and the total
assessed value of property tax deductions in the unit under
IC 6-1.1-12-41 or IC 6-1.1-12-42 in the particular calendar
year, divided by the sum of the civil taxing unit's total assessed
value of all taxable property and the total assessed value of
property tax deductions in the unit under IC 6-1.1-12-41 or
IC 6-1.1-12-42 in the calendar year immediately preceding the
particular calendar year.
STEP THREE: Divide the sum of the three (3) quotients
computed in STEP TWO by three (3).
STEP FOUR: Compute separately, for each of the calendar
years determined in STEP ONE, the quotient (rounded to the
nearest ten-thousandth (0.0001)) of the sum of the total
assessed value of all taxable property in all counties and the
total assessed value of property tax deductions in all counties
under IC 6-1.1-12-41 or IC 6-1.1-12-42 in the particular
calendar year, divided by the sum of the total assessed value
of all taxable property in all counties and the total assessed
value of property tax deductions in all counties under
IC 6-1.1-12-41 or IC 6-1.1-12-42 in the calendar year
immediately preceding the particular calendar year.
STEP FIVE: Divide the sum of the three (3) quotients
computed in STEP FOUR by three (3).
STEP SIX: Divide the STEP THREE amount by the STEP
FIVE amount.
The civil taxing unit may increase its levy by a percentage not
greater than the percentage by which the STEP THREE amount
exceeds the percentage by which the civil taxing unit may
increase its levy under section 3 of this chapter based on the
assessed value growth quotient determined under section 2 of this
chapter.
(4) Permission to the civil taxing unit to increase its levy in excess
of the limitations established under section 3 of this chapter, if the
local government tax control board finds that the civil taxing unit
needs the increase to pay the costs of furnishing fire protection for
the civil taxing unit through a volunteer fire department. For
purposes of determining a township's need for an increased levy,
the local government tax control board shall not consider the
amount of money borrowed under IC 36-6-6-14 during the
immediately preceding calendar year. However, any increase in
the amount of the civil taxing unit's levy recommended by the
local government tax control board under this subdivision for the
ensuing calendar year may not exceed the lesser of:
(A) ten thousand dollars ($10,000); or
(B) twenty percent (20%) of:
(i) the amount authorized for operating expenses of a
volunteer fire department in the budget of the civil taxing
unit for the immediately preceding calendar year; plus
(ii) the amount of any additional appropriations authorized
during that calendar year for the civil taxing unit's use in
paying operating expenses of a volunteer fire department
under this chapter; minus
(iii) the amount of money borrowed under IC 36-6-6-14
during that calendar year for the civil taxing unit's use in
paying operating expenses of a volunteer fire department.
(5) Permission to a civil taxing unit to increase its levy in excess
of the limitations established under section 3 of this chapter in
order to raise revenues for pension payments and contributions
the civil taxing unit is required to make under IC 36-8. The
maximum increase in a civil taxing unit's levy that may be
recommended under this subdivision for an ensuing calendar year
equals the amount, if any, by which the pension payments and
contributions the civil taxing unit is required to make under
IC 36-8 during the ensuing calendar year exceeds the product of
one and one-tenth (1.1) multiplied by the pension payments and
contributions made by the civil taxing unit under IC 36-8 during
the calendar year that immediately precedes the ensuing calendar
year. For purposes of this subdivision, "pension payments and
contributions made by a civil taxing unit" does not include that
part of the payments or contributions that are funded by
distributions made to a civil taxing unit by the state.
(6) Permission to increase its levy in excess of the limitations
established under section 3 of this chapter if the local government
tax control board finds that:
(A) the township's township assistance ad valorem property
tax rate is less than one and sixty-seven hundredths cents
($0.0167) per one hundred dollars ($100) of assessed
valuation; and
(B) the township needs the increase to meet the costs of
providing township assistance under IC 12-20 and IC 12-30-4.
hundred (16,600); or
(v) a city having a population of more than seven thousand
(7,000) but less than seven thousand three hundred (7,300);
and
(B) the increase is necessary to provide funding to undertake
removal (as defined in IC 13-11-2-187) and remedial action
(as defined in IC 13-11-2-185) relating to hazardous
substances (as defined in IC 13-11-2-98) in solid waste
disposal facilities or industrial sites in the civil taxing unit that
have become a menace to the public health and welfare.
The maximum increase that the local government tax control
board may recommend for such a civil taxing unit is the levy that
would result from a property tax rate of six and sixty-seven
hundredths cents ($0.0667) for each one hundred dollars ($100)
of assessed valuation. For purposes of computing the ad valorem
property tax levy limit imposed on a civil taxing unit under
section 3 of this chapter, the civil taxing unit's ad valorem
property tax levy for a particular year does not include that part of
the levy imposed under this subdivision. In addition, a property
tax increase permitted under this subdivision may be imposed for
only two (2) calendar years.
(9) Permission for a county:
(A) having a population of more than eighty thousand (80,000)
but less than ninety thousand (90,000) to increase the county's
levy in excess of the limitations established under section 3 of
this chapter, if the local government tax control board finds
that the county needs the increase to meet the county's share of
the costs of operating a jail or juvenile detention center,
including expansion of the facility, if the jail or juvenile
detention center is opened after December 31, 1991;
(B) that operates a county jail or juvenile detention center that
is subject to an order that:
(i) was issued by a federal district court; and
(ii) has not been terminated;
(C) that operates a county jail that fails to meet:
(i) American Correctional Association Jail Construction
Standards; and
(ii) Indiana jail operation standards adopted by the
department of correction; or
(D) that operates a juvenile detention center that fails to meet
standards equivalent to the standards described in clause (C)
for the operation of juvenile detention centers.
Before recommending an increase, the local government tax
control board shall consider all other revenues available to the
county that could be applied for that purpose. An appeal for
operating funds for a jail or a juvenile detention center shall be
considered individually, if a jail and juvenile detention center are
both opened in one (1) county. The maximum aggregate levy
increases that the local government tax control board may
recommend for a county equals the county's share of the costs of
operating the jail or a juvenile detention center for the first full
calendar year in which the jail or juvenile detention center is in
operation.
(10) Permission for a township to increase its levy in excess of the
limitations established under section 3 of this chapter, if the local
government tax control board finds that the township needs the
increase so that the property tax rate to pay the costs of furnishing
fire protection for a township, or a portion of a township, enables
the township to pay a fair and reasonable amount under a contract
with the municipality that is furnishing the fire protection.
However, for the first time an appeal is granted the resulting rate
increase may not exceed fifty percent (50%) of the difference
between the rate imposed for fire protection within the
municipality that is providing the fire protection to the township
and the township's rate. A township is required to appeal a second
time for an increase under this subdivision if the township wants
to further increase its rate. However, a township's rate may be
increased to equal but may not exceed the rate that is used by the
municipality. More than one (1) township served by the same
municipality may use this appeal.
(11) Permission for a township to increase its levy in excess of the
limitations established under section 3 of this chapter, if the local
government tax control board finds that the township has been
required, for the three (3) consecutive years preceding the year for
which the appeal under this subdivision is to become effective, to
borrow funds under IC 36-6-6-14 to furnish fire protection for the
township or a part of the township. However, the maximum
increase in a township's levy that may be allowed under this
subdivision is the least of the amounts borrowed under
IC 36-6-6-14 during the preceding three (3) calendar years. A
township may elect to phase in an approved increase in its levy
under this subdivision over a period not to exceed three (3) years.
A particular township may appeal to increase its levy under this
section not more frequently than every fourth calendar year.
(12) Permission to a city having a population of more than
twenty-nine thousand (29,000) but less than thirty-one thousand
(31,000) to increase its levy in excess of the limitations
established under section 3 of this chapter if:
(A) an appeal was granted to the city under this section to
reallocate property tax replacement credits under IC 6-3.5-1.1
in 1998, 1999, and 2000; and
(B) the increase has been approved by the legislative body of
the city, and the legislative body of the city has by resolution
determined that the increase is necessary to pay normal
operating expenses.
The maximum amount of the increase is equal to the amount of
property tax replacement credits under IC 6-3.5-1.1 that the city
petitioned under this section to have reallocated in 2001 for a
purpose other than property tax relief.".
Delete page 6.
amended personal property tax return filed by a taxpayer after
December 31, 2006, and before March 1, 2007, for the assessment
dates.
(c) As used in this SECTION, "assessment dates" refers to
assessment dates (as defined in IC 6-1.1-1-2(1)) in 2002, 2003, and
2004.
(d) As used in this SECTION, "return" refers to the personal
property tax return required under IC 6-1.1-3-7.
(e) As used in this SECTION, "taxpayer" means a taxpayer
that:
(1) filed original returns under IC 6-1.1-3-7 for the assessment
dates; and
(2) filed amended returns for the assessment dates.
(f) The amended returns:
(1) are allowed; and
(2) are considered to have been timely filed.
(g) A taxpayer is entitled to the exemptions for tangible personal
property claimed on:
(1) Schedule B of the amended returns; and
(2) the Form 103-W filed with the amended returns.
(h) Any notice of increased assessed value issued by a township
assessor with respect to personal property that is the subject of an
amended return is considered withdrawn and nullified.
(i) IC 6-1.1-37-9 and IC 6-1.1-37-10 do not apply to any
additional personal property taxes owed by a taxpayer as a result
of filing an amended return.
(j) This SECTION expires July 1, 2008.
and when so amended that said bill do pass.
Committee Vote: Yeas 8, Nays 0.
Kenley